Subject Proposal:
The students are expected to propose topics of their own choosing. These topics should not be part of the regular data science curriculum but extend to related topics; e.g., not simply "Neural Networks" but more specialized, such as
"Issues of Vanishing Gradients for Recurrent Neural Networks"... The investigations should focus on a theoretical aspects of techniques, e.g., what are the principal motivations or ideas for approaches? why do things work?
why/when do they not work? etc.
The students must submit a one-page proposal of the subject they want to work on by Wednesday, October 22 to Moodle. This proposal needs to include:
Written Summary:
The students are expected to summarize their findings in a written document of roughly 10-15 pages. This text should be self-contained, i.e., understandable for readers without being an expert in the specific topic, and scientific statements should be underpinned with references to
the scientific literature.
To ensure the students' progress, on December 12th there will be a meeting with Richard Huber where the current state of the work will be discussed, and suggestions for improvement are made. The students are not expected to have a perfect written document at that point, but the further the work has progressed
the more concrete suggestions for improvement and further guidance can be given.
The students need to submit their final report no later than 30.01.2026 via Moodle.
Presentation:
In January, the students are expected to present their findings to the other participants of the seminar in roughly 40 minute presentations. These presentations are not only meant to showcase what the student has learned, but simultaneously be educational to the listeners, so that students gain an overview of all topics.
After each presentation, the presenter is expected to answer the audience's questions on the concrete findings, but also on the research topic more broadly.
The sessions for presentation in January are already set, but which student will present his work will be decided at a later point.
As mentioned above, the seminar has three principally graded activities: the subject proposal and defence (1/6), the written report (1/3) and the presentation (1/2). The final grade is gained as a weighted average of these sub-grades with one-sixth, one-third and half contributions, respectively. Additionally, each part must be positive by itself, i.e., the final report must be satisfactory even if performance in the presentation was excellent.
| Date | Subject | Remarks |
| 10.10.2025 | Discussion of the seminar format and grading | |
| 24.10.2025 | Presentation of topic proposals | |
| 12.12.2025 | Progress discussion | Will not take place in the seminar room, but in Leechgasse 34. The precise times can be agreed with Richard Huber upon request. |
| 09.01.2026 | Presentation of results | |
| 16.01.2026 | Presentation of results | |
| 23.01.2026 | Presentation of results | |
| 30.01.2026 | Presentation of results |